GHANA LAW FINDER

                         

Self help guide to the Law

  Easy to use   Case and Subject matter index  and more tonykaddy@yahoo.co.uk
                

HOME           4  WEST AFRICA COURT OF APPEAL

 

                                       

                               Accra, 30th May, 1938.

                                     Cor. Kingdon and Petrides, C.JJ., and Yates, J.

                                                                 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE .............................. Respondent.

                                     v.

                                                                KWAKU KLU AND OTHERS ................................. Appellants.

                                                                         

Appeal Court. 30th May, 1988. Appeals from Supreme Court exercising appellate jurisdiction.

Charge of unlawful assembly contra. section 346 Cap 29 but conviction of Riot when not so charged-Powers of sections 319 and 326 of cap. 10 invoked by Appeal Court.

Held: Findings altered; sentences maintained.

There is no need to set out the facts. A. J. A1'nley for Crown.

T. Hutton-Mills for Appellants.

The following joint judgment was delivered:-

KING-DON, C.J., NIGERIA, PETRIDES, C.J., GOLD COAST .AND YATES, J.

In this case fifty-eight persons were charged in the Court of the Magistrate held at Krachi " for that they on the 24th day of "October, 1937, at Krachikrom ........................  did unlawfully assemble together with a purpose of committing a riot " contrary to section 346, Cap. 29 ". The Magistrate on the 1st November, 1937, convicted fifty-four out of the fifty-eight and adjourned the case of the other four till next day. The ultimate fate of these four does not appear in the record before us, but we are informed by counsel that they were acquitted and dis­charged. But the whole fifty-eight seem to have appealed against the conviction to the Supreme Court as though they were all convicted. The Supreme Court dismissed all the appeals. From this decision all the fifty-eight have appealed to this Court. The t1ppeals of the four men, viz., Yaw Okunyi, Yaw Donkor, Kwelji Djatto and Kwadjo Mparah, against whom there is no record of a conviction are struck out. In the case of the other fifty-four men there is no substance whatever in their appeals, but there is an error in the form of the judgment which requires to be corrected.

At the opening of his judgment the learned Magistrate says:-

" With regard to the fifty-eight accused before the Court, " excepting Yaw Okunyi, Yaw Donkor, Kwesi Djatto " and Kwadjo Mprah, I am satisfied that the charge .. is proved ".

But when it comes to recording an actual finding he says (referring to the remaining fifty-four only) :_

" In doing so, their action constituted an act of riot, in " the commission of which I find them all guilty, " and order that each shall pay a fine of £5 or three months imprisonment in lieu thereof".

This on the face of it is a conviction for " riot", an offence with which the appellants were not charged.

We, therefore, acting under the powers conferred upon us by the combined effect of sections 319 and 325 of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Cap. 10), alter the finding to one of "Guilty of the offence charged" in the case of each of the appellants, and, in each case, maintain the sentence.

 
 

Legal Library Services        Copyright - 2003 All Rights Reserved.