GHANA LAW FINDER

                         

Self help guide to the Law

  Easy to use   Case and Subject matter index  and more tonykaddy@yahoo.co.uk
                

HOME           5  WEST AFRICA COURT OF APPEAL

 

                          

                                                                    Accra, 3rd April, 1939,

COR. PETRIDES AND WEBB, C J J, AND BUTLER LLOYD, AG. C,J.

                                                                    FUGAH AND AKOGLO                       Plaintiffs-Appellants.

                                                                   AWUMEE GBEDEMAH

                                     v.

                                                               AMAKLOE, CHIEF ATTIPOE                  Defendant-Respondent.

                                                                                                        

Appeal Court, 3rd April, 1939. Motion for final leave to appeal to Privy Council.

Personal Bund not binding against tribe-Application for amendment and re-execution of Bond during trial. The appellants were ordered to execute a Bond binding against the Klevie tribe, the sufficiency of such Bond to be determined by a Judge of the West African Court of Appeal. The Bond was executed by the appellants personally, and Barton J. adjourned the question of the sufficiency of this Bond for the consideration of the Court.

Held: Bond executed in personal capacity and not binding on tribe. Permission to amend and re-execute the Bond refused as Respondent had had no opportunity to consider the effect or validity of alleged authority given to appellants by tribe.

Final leave to appeal refused.

Frans Dove for the Appellants.

R. E. Phipps for the Respondent.

The following joint judgment was delivered :-

PETRIDES, (,j., GOLD COAST, WEBB, (,J., SIERRA LEONE, AND BUTLER LLOYD, AG. (,J., NIGERIA.

Application for final leave to appeal is refused. On 29th November, 1938, the named appellants were given up to ::!8th February to execute a Bond that would be binding as against the Klevie Tribe, the sufficiency of the Bond to be determined by a Judge of this Court.

On 27th February they executed a Bond. The matter came before Barton J. on the 15th March when he, being of opinion that bond had been executed by appellants in their personal capacity, adjourned the matter for consideration of this Court. In our opinion the new bond is executed by Fugah and Akoglo in their personal capacity. They do not purport to sign as representatives of the tribe. Their Counsel suggests that the Court should now allow them to amend and re-execute the Bond saying that they have at all events written authority to institute these proceedings.

In our opinion it would be unreasonable to adopt this course because the Respondent had no opportunity of considering the effect or validity of the alleged authority. The appellants were repre­sented by Counsel last November and if they failed to take his advice in the preparation of the new Bond they have only themselves to blame.

In our opinion the Bond dated 27th February, 1939, is insufficient to comply with the previous order of this Court and we accordingly refuse final leave to appeal.

We grant the respondent £7 7s. costs.

As we have refused final leave the other motion is dismissed, Mr. Dove stating he knows nothing about it.

   

 
 

Legal Library Services        Copyright - 2003 All Rights Reserved.