GHANA LAW FINDER

                         

Self help guide to the Law

  Easy to use   Case and Subject matter index  and more tonykaddy@yahoo.co.uk
                

HOME           2  WEST AFRICA COURT OF APPEAL

 

                                                                       

                                        Accra, 20th November, 1934.

                                             Cor. Kingdon, C.J., Aitken, and Graham Paul, JJ.

                                          INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE.

                                   v.

                                        MORLAI KAMARA.     

 

Summary Jurisdiction Act of 1848 of all force and effect in this Colony, but seeing that that section deals with substantive criminal law only 'whereas the 1848 Act is a purely Procedural Statute. we cannot accept that short cut to a solution of the question. We can, however, arrive at a solution by the following reasoning:-

First of all it is very doubtful if a Statute like the Act of J848 could be held to apply to the Police Magistrates' Courts of this Kingdon, Colony, which are branches of the Supreme Court invested with C.J.

far larger powers and wider jurisdictions than a Petty Sessional Aitken Court in England. A time limit of six months to prevent stale and prosecutions for petty offence in a country like England is by no Graham means a statutory provision which obviously fits in with local Paul, JJ. circumstances and the status of our Courts of Summary Juristiction.

In the second place a cursory study of the Supreme Court Ordinance, the Criminal Procedure Ordinance and the Commis­sioners Ordinance, all of which are to be read together, suffices to show that the Colonial legislature has adopted and embodied in its own Ordinances practically every provision of the 1848 Act except the six months time limit provided by section 11 thereof. From these legislative activities it seems reasonably clear (a) that the Colonial legislature intended to replace the 1848 Act by its local Ordinances, and (b) that it had decided that the six months limit was not suitable to the circumstances and conditions of this Colony.

Lastly we have section 15 of the Supreme Court Ordinance, which explicitly enacts that the jurisdiction vested by that Ordi­nance in the Supreme Court shall be exercised (so far as regards procedure and practice) in the manner provided by itself, and the Criminal Procedure Ordinance, or by rules and orders of the Court made pursuant to its own provisions.

In the face of that section it seems well nigh impossible to argue that the procedure and practice of the local Supreme Court, which includes all Courts of the Police Magistrates and District Commissioners in the Colony, can be affected by any other enactments than those specified therein. Our judgment on the question at issue may thus be summarised as follows :-The criminal procedure in the Colonial Police Magistrates' and District Commissioners' Courts is regulated and governed by our local laws, which have made ample provision therefor, and there appears to be no reason ~'whatsoever to pray in aid the provisions of any English Statute " of general application".

In our opinion, therefore, section 11 of the Summary .Jurisdiction Act of 1848 does not apply to this Colony ..

 

 
 

Legal Library Services        Copyright - 2003 All Rights Reserved.