GHANA LAW FINDER

                         

Self help guide to the Law

  Easy to use   Case and Subject matter index  and more tonykaddy@yahoo.co.uk
                

HOME           1  WEST AFRICAN COURT OF APPEAL

 

          

                                              MOSES ASAFU ADJEI                                                        Plaintiff-Appellant.

                        v.

                            CHIEF YAW DABANKA AND KW AMI AKOWUA                         Defendant-Respondent.

                                                           Accra, 16th June 1930.

                                                

 

Land-Mort~age--Construction-Consequences of renewal of lease.

In consideration of a loan of £250 the plaintiff deposited with a predecessor of the defendant Akowua, by name Derkyi, his document of title to certain leasehold premises, and at the same time by an informal document purported to grant to the said defendant his interest in the said premises. The principal conditions in this document were that the plaintiff was to remain in possession and that the lease was to be the absolute property of Derkyi if the principal and interest were not paid within one year. The principal and interest were not paid within the time specified, and Derkyi sold the lease to the defendant Dabanka.

The plaintiff sued in the Circuit Court of Ashanti for the return of his premises, but his action failed.

On appeal it was held that the original transaction between plaintiff and Derkyi was not a native mortgage because the plaintiff was to remain in possession. The Court held it to be an equitable mortgage which plaintiff was still entitled to redeem, and ordered the sale to set aside and the premises to be assigned to the plaintiff.

As regards certain renewals of the lease which had been effected by Akowua,

it was held that they were engrafted on the old lease and formed part of the security.

E. O. Asafu-Ad.faye for the Plaintiff-Appellant.

A. M. Akiwumi for the first Defendant-Respondent. The following judgments were delivered :-

MICHELIN, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Acting Circuit Judgt of Ashanti (His Honour Francis John McDowell) dated the oth October 1929, in favour of the defendants with costs.

By his writ of summons dated the 28th July, 1928, the plaintiff claimed from the first defendant :-

"possession of plaintiff's compound house situated at Kajatia on plot No. 387 which plot is known as Juabeng Stool land, and which house by a mortgage deed dated the 27th day of August, 1912, was mortgaged by the plaintiff to one Kojo Derkyi since deceased for a loan of £250 plus interest of £100, which said compound house the said Kojo Derkyi deceased transferred possession of to Chief Yaw Dabanka as Caretaker."

On the action coming on for hearing before the Court on the 6th September, 1928, Kwami Akowua was on the application of the plaintiff joined as a co-defendant and the writ of summons was amended to read as follows:-

Plaintiff's claim is to call upon :-

(a) the second defendant Kwami Akowua to shew cause why he should refuse to accept repayment of an amount of £350 being as to £250 money lent to plaintiff by his predecessor Kwadjo Derkyi (since deceased) and as to £100 interest charged thereon, and which sum of £350 is due and payable under Deed of Mortgage dated 27-8-1912 and repayment of which amount was secured by plaintiff's house situated at Kajatia Prison Road Kumasi.

" (b) The first defendant Chief Yaw Dabanka to show cause why he alleged to have bought plaintiff's house situated at Kajatia Prison Road Kumasi for the sum of £250, well knowing the same to have been mortgaged to one Kojo Derkyi (since deceased) and of whom K wami Akowua is now the successor, and of which property the said Chief Yaw Dabanka was Caretaker who also signed as an attesting witness to the Mortgage Deed dated ~7-8-1912 given to the said Kwadjo Derkyi (since deceased)."

The plaintiff not having had the advantage of the assistance of Counsel in preparing his writ of summons, these particulars are rather peculiarly worded, but it is clear that the action as against the first defendant was intended to be a claim for the recovery of the possession of the mortgaged premises on the ground of the sale to the first defendant being invalid, and as against the second defendant, it was a claim for redemption.

It will be as well at this stage to set out in detail the contents of the mortgage deed in respect of which this action has been brought, and which was admitted in evidence in the Court below as Exhibit " A."

It reads as follows :-

.. This Indenture made the 27th day of August 1912 Between Moses Adjaye of Coomassie hereinafter called the Mortgagor which expression shall where the context so admits include his heirs successors and repre­sentatives, of the one part, and Kojo Derkyi of Coomassie hereinafter called the Mortgagee which expression shall where the context so admits include his heirs successors and representatives of the other part Witnesseth that whereas the Mortgagee hath at the request of the Mortgagor agreed to lend

£250 to the Mortgagor the sum Two hundred and fifty pounds on repayment of the £100 same in one year from the date thereof with an interest of One Hundred Pounds and Whereas the Mortgagor is the owner in his own right of the building hereinafter charged with the payment of the Mortgage debt or intended so to be Now This Indenture Witnesseth that in consideration of the sum of Two Huadred and Fifty Pounds (£250) paid by the Mortgagee to the Mortgagor the receipt whereof the J.\Iortgagor hereby acknowledges together with interest hereinbefore provided the Mortgagor hereby grants unto the Mortgagee All the Building situate in the town of Coomassie in the Market Road known as Moses Adjaye's house under the following terms and conditions :-

.. 1. That upon the Mortgagor failing to pay to the Mortgagee the sum of Three hundred and fifty Pounds £350 at the end of one year from the date hereof then the Mortgagee shall enter, take possession of and freely enjoy the use of the Building herein above referred to, which shall from that date and for ever be and remain the property of the Mortgagee absolutely and without any manner of condition .

.. 2. That the said Building shall remain in the possession use and control of the Mortgagor who shall also draw and receive all rents accruing therefrom until the end of one year from the date of these presentshis predecessor Kwadjo Derkyi (since deceased) and as to £100 interest charged thereon, and which sum of £350 is due and payable under Deed of Mortgage dated 27-8-1912 and repayment of which amount was secured by plaintiff's house situated at Kajatia Prison Road Kumasi.

" (b) The first defendant Chief Yaw Dabanka to show cause why he alleged to have bought plaintiff's house situated at Kajatia Prison Road Kumasi for the sum of £250, well knowing the same to have been mortgaged to one Kojo Derkyi (since deceased) and of whom Kwami Akowua is now the successor, and of which property the said Chief Yaw Dabanka was Caretaker who also signed as an attesting witness to the Mortgage Deed dated 27-8-1912 given to the said Kwadjo Derkyi (since deceased)."

The plaintiff not having had the advantage of the assistance of Counsel in preparing his writ of summons, these particulars are rather peculiarly worded, but it is clear that the action as against the first defendant was intended to be a claim for the recovery of the possession of the mortgaged premises on the ground of the sale to the first defendant being invalid, and as against the second defendant, it was a claim for redemption.

It will be as well at this stage to set out in detail the contents of the mortgage deed in respect of which this action has been brought, and which was admitted in evidence in the Court below as Exhibit " A."

It reads as follows :-

.• This Indenture made the 27th day of August 1912 Between Moses Adjaye of Coomassie hereinafter called the Mortgagor which expression shall where the context so admits include his heirs successors and repre­sentatives, of the one part, and Kojo Derkyi of Coomassie hereinafter called the Mortgagee which expression shall where the context so admits include his heirs successors and representatives of the other part Witnesseth that whereas the Mortgagee hath at the request of the Mortgagor agreed to lend

£250 to the Mortgagor the sum Two hundred and fifty pounds on repayment of the £100 same in one year from the date thereof with an interest of One Hundred Pounds and Whereas the Mortgagor is the owner in his own right of the building hereinafter charged with the payment of the Mortgage debt or intended so to be Now This Indenture Witnesseth that in consideration of the sum of Two Huadred and Fifty Pounds (£250) paid by the Mortgagee to the Mortgagor the receipt whereof the Mortgagor hereby acknowledges together with interest hereinbefore provided the Mortgagor hereby grants unto the Mortgagee All the Building situate in the town of Coomassie in the Market Road known as Moses Adjaye's house under the following terms and conditions :-

.. 1. That upon the Mortgagor failing to pay to the Mortgagee the sum of Three hundred and fifty Pounds £350 at the end of one year from the date hereof then the Mortgagee shall enter, take possession of and freely enjoy the use of the Building herein above referred to, which shall from that date and for ever be and remain the property of the Mortgagee absolutely and without any manner of condition .

.. 2. That the said Building shall remain in the possession use and control of the Mortgagor who shall also draw and receive all rents accruing therefrom until the end of one year from the date of these presents.

 3. That the Mortgagee shall not take possession of the Mortgaged building as herein provided until he shall have delivered such notice to any caretaker whom the Mortgagor may put in charge of the said building, or left such notice on the said building or any conspicuous parts of it .

•• As Witness the hand of Moses Adjaye at Coomassie the day and year first above written.

Moses Q. Adjaye his

                                                                                 Kojo Derkyi X

mark. " Signed by the said Kojo Derkyi at Coomassie this Indenture having been first read over and explained to him in the Ashanti language by me when. he seemed to understand the same and made his mark thereto in my presence Harry Anaman Licensed Letter Writer

Central District; No. 1091.

Witnesses

his

                   Chief Yao Adabanka     X

                         of Tafu             mark.

his

                    Kwamin Mensah   X

mark. his

                    Kofi Poku               X

mark."

i Although not so stated in the Mortgage deed, it is apparent , from the evidence that the land upon which the mortgaged house

I

 was erected was land which had been leased by the Mortgagor from the Chief of Juabin who in turn held this land under a lease from the Government of Ashanti.

The facts appear to be shortly as follows :-On the 27th August, 1912, the plaintiff obtained a loan of £2M from one Kwadjo Derkyi the predecessor of the second defendant which he undertook to repay with interest agreed upon at the sum of £100, and at the same time he secured the payment of this debt by executing the document marked "A" which was deposited by him together with the lease of the premises with the said Kwadjo Derkyi. The plaintiff then apparently left Kumasi, and went to a place called Bana, finally returning to Kumasi in the year 1925. During his absence he had left the first defendant, as his caretaker, in charge of the house, and had authorised him to collect the rents thereon during his absence. On his return he endeavoured to redeem the house which he had mortgaged by offering payment of the sum of £350 to the second defendant, who in the meantime on the death of the Mortgagee had succeeded him, but the plaintiff was informed that during his absence the house had been sold, the purchaser being the first defendant, whom he had left in charge of the house in his absence. The first defendant refused, however, to give up the house to the plaintiff, and the redemption could not therefore be effected. The present action was therefore instituted.

The learned trial Judge held that the sale by the mortgagee was valid sale and refused to set aside such sale, and he also held that the action as against the second defendant was wrongly conceived, the plaintiff's remedy being in damages.


 


 

 
 
 

Legal Library Services        Copyright - 2003 All Rights Reserved.