GHANA LAW FINDER

                         

Self help guide to the Law

  Easy to use   Case and Subject matter index  and more tonykaddy@yahoo.co.uk
                

HOME           7  WEST AFRICA COURT OF APPEAL

 
                                           

                                                                   LAGOS, 23RD APRIL, 1941

                                               K1KGDON, PETRIDES AND GHAHAM PAUL, C.JJ

                                                                         PETER M. IDUNDUN                             Respondent

                                                                                         v

                                                                             S. E. O. IYARA                                   Appellant.

                        


Appeal from conviction by High Court.


Prosecution for wilful destruction of property and forcible entry~ contra. section.- 451 and 81 respectively of Criminal Code­" Remitted" to High Court by Magistrate-Magistrate n power to remit-:-High Court however issued hearing notices.

Held: High Court had jurisdiction to hear case summarily. Appeal dismissed.

There is no need to set out the facts.

Nelson- William.-  for Respondent.

A. Soetan for Appellant.

The following joint judgment was delivered:­

KiNGDON, C.J., NIGERIA, PETRIDES, C.J., COLD COAST AND GRAHAM PAUL, C.J., SIERRA LEONE.

The only ground of appeal which need be dealt with in this case is the first which is that the case was not properly before the High Court. The case got before the High Court by being remitted" thereto by the Magistrate (Full Powers) Warri, There is of course no power in a Magistrate to " remit" a case to the High Court, and the order remitting was irregular and nee! not have been acted upon by the High Court. The High Court' however, issued hearing notices to the parties and having in that way got the parties before it proceeded to hear the ease summaril)1 We are of opinion that It had Jurisdiction so to do, for we know of no such restriction upon this summary jurisdiction of the High Court as that suggested by counsel for the appellant.

This ground of appeal therefore fails .

There is no substance in any of the other grounds of appeal and the appeal is dismissed.


 

 
 

Legal Library Services        Copyright - 2003 All Rights Reserved.