Appeal Court
9th Aug., 1938.
Possession
of Counterfeit coins, contra. sec.
150A of Criminal Code-Maximum
sentence imposed.
Held: Trial
Judge having taken into account
guilt of appellant of a more
serious offence (with which he was
not charged) the sentence is
reduced.
There is no
need to set out the facts. C.
N. S. Pollard for Crown.
Appellant in person.
The following
joint judgment was delivered:-
KINGDON, C.J.,
NIGERIA, CAREY AND GRAHAM PAUL, JJ.
In this case
the learned trial Judge passed the
maximum sentence for the offence,
'Viz., seven years
imprisonment with hard labour,
From the note he made in doing so,
it is clear that he considered the
accused guilty of more serious
counterfeiting offences and took
this into consideration in
deciding upon the maximum
sentence. The appellant was not
convicted of the more serious
offences and should not have been
punished as though he had been. We
therefore consider that the
sentence should be reduced. But
the offence of which the appellant
was convicted is a serious one and
he had in his possession a very
large number of counterfeit coins.
A heavy sentence is therefore
called for, though not the
maximum. The sentence passed at
the trial is quashed and in
substitution therefor the
appellant is sentenced to five
years imprisonment with hard
labour.
|