Appeal Court. 11 January, 1936,
Appeal against sentences-Sentences
enhanced.
There is no necessity to set out
the facts of this case. Appellants
in person.
A. R. W. Sayle
for Crown.
The foHowing joint judgment was
delivered:-
KINGDON, C.J., NIGERIA, BUTLER
LLOYD AND GRAHAM PAUL,
]J.
In this case the two appellants
have appealed against sentences of
three years LH.L. passed upon each
of them by the High Court of the
Kaduna Division. The Court is
satisfied that the sentences
certainly are not too severe, and
the Crown has asked that they be
enhanced. The two appellants were
caught with a large number of
counterfeit coins and no genuine
ones. They are of a tribe in the
Southern Provinces where
counterfeiting is rife and they
were seeking to utter these coins
in the Northern Provinces. Had
they been caught and tried
anywhere in the Southern Provinces
they would undoubtedly have
received very much more severe
sentences, and we are of opinion
that the uttering of counterfeit
coins in the Northern Provinces,
where it has not yet reached the
prevalence it has in the Southern
Provinces, should be checked, if
possible, by appropriately severe
sentences. We have accordingly
decided to enhance the sentences.
The sentences passed at the trial
are quashed and in substitution
therefor the following sentences
are passed :-
On the first appellant, four years
LH.L. On the second appellant,
four years LH.L. Sentences to run
from date of conviction.
|