GHANA LAW FINDER

                         

Self help guide to the Law

  Easy to use   Case and Subject matter index  and more tonykaddy@yahoo.co.uk
                

HOME           8  WEST AFRICA COURT OF APPEAL

 

                                

                        LAGOS, 2ND FEBRUARY, 1942.

       COR KINGDON. C.J., BUTLER LLOYD AND FRANCIS, JJ.

 

                                                                      REX                                             Respondent

                                                                          v

                                                           AMUSA ADIGUN                                Appellant

 

LAGOS, 3RD FEBRUARY, 1942.

COR. KINGDON, C.J., BUTLER LLOYD AND BAKER JJ.

                                                                                    REX    Respondent

'V.


 

 


 

1.   OK ON EKPENYONG PHILLIP

2.   HENRY IGUMA OSHODI


 

 

Appellants


 

 


 

Appeal from conviction by High Court.


 

 

Cr.iminal Law--Conspiracy to commit felon'JJ contra section 516 Criminal Code--Count bad for uncertainty.

Held: .The particulars omitted the nature of the felony and the count was held bad for uncertainty.

Mckinstry for Crown. Vkon for Appellant.

The following joint judgment was delivered:-

KINGDON, C.J., NIGERIA, BUTIJER LJ~OYD AND BAKER,

       JJ.                                                       -

We can find no substance in any of the. grounds of Appeal filed and argued on behalf of the two appellants in this case. We are, however, of opinion that the convictions on count 14 cannot stand.

That count reads:-


 

 


 

and


 

 

" Conspiracy to commit felony contrary to section 516 " of the Criminal Code."

             i              •

the particulars gIven are:-

"Okon Ekpenyong Phillip and Henry Iguma Oshodi " between the months of March, 1940, and November, 1940, "at Calabar and Oron in the Calabar Magisterial area " conspired to commit felony."


 

 


 

We JIold that this is bad for uncertainty. The accused should be given notice of the nature of the felony which it is alleged they have conspired to commit.

The appeal of each of the appelJants against his conviction upon count 14 is accordingly allowed, the convictions and sentences upon that count are quashed and it is directed that in respect of that count a judgment and verdict of acquittal be enteJ>ed in favour of each of the Appellants.

The convictions of each appellant upon the other counts are upheld.


 
 
 

Legal Library Services        Copyright - 2003 All Rights Reserved.